top of page
  • Writer's pictureWendy Meigs

Getting Gritty 4: Meigs' Cases: Abused Further with Manipulation, Threats & Lies

Updated: Jan 2, 2020





Click Link for Importance of Questions to Meigs' Case: Deceptions

Preface to Individuals Involved.

==All Statements, Opinions, Conclusions and Assumptions are personal opinions and conclusions of Wendy Meigs and do not intend to be assumed as judgment or declarations. Wendy Meigs holds copyright to all statements, conclusions, assumptions and story. © ==

Meigs' Lawsuits against Bergman and Zucker were Dismissed. Case Information.

Both are currently in APPEALS.


Questions for Analysis for this Blog:

What ways were used to attempt to force Meigs to sign the printed mediation agreement that released all liability for all lawyers?

1. Meigs was victim-blamed for being abused at mediation.

Victim-Blamed by Lawyers

2. Meigs was told that she was experiencing "buyers remorse" when Meigs told the lawyers that she wanted the agreement revoked for abuse, drugging and manipulation.

Accused of "Buyer's Remorse" after Abuse

3. Meigs was threatened in numerous ways in the confession email written by Zucker with Bohreer's contribution including threatening my pharmacy license for fighting against abuse as the only woman among five men.

Zucker Memorandum Post-Mediation Includes Threats

4. Evans, Bohreer and Zucker stated that they would abandon and not represent Meigs if Meigs refused to sign the printed mediation agreement.

Meigs Abandoned for Fighting Against Abuse

5. Evans suggested the family court remedy to Zucker to force enforcement of the agreement rather than fight against the agreement according to Meigs' requests.

Family Court Remedy Hidden from Meigs Permits Meigs' Revocation

6. Zucker acknowledges to Evans that Bergman forgot the family code remedy meaning that Meigs could revoke but instead of helping Meigs revoke, Evans, Zucker and Bohreer continued to threaten Meigs with paying all legal fees at summary judgment and all plus withdrawing and not representing Meigs against the summary judgment. Why did Meigs lawyer's not zealously represent Meigs unless they too were possibly protecting Frankfort for aiding and abetting Johnston and/or protecting Bergman at this point? Could there be another reason? Did all lawyers conspire to confuse and manipulate Meigs in order to force her into a position where she felt that she had no choice but to sign the handwritten draft agreement?

Lawyers Intentionally Fail in Representation

7. Rodney Castille, found through Facebook and unemployed at that time, stated that he was confused as to the summary judgment as the mediation agreement lacked form, the family code remedy that states the agreement is irrevocable and thus allowed Meigs to revoke. Castille stated that no other litigation was required.

Frivolous Litigation Assisted Perpetration of Fraud

8. After speaking with Zucker and all, Castille changed his story and said that litigation was required per contract law. Meigs did not know this to be false until she started to represent herself and contacted other lawyers who stated that once Meigs revoked the agreement after the 2015 mediation, the agreement was revoked due to missing family remedy 6.602. Yet, Meigs paid significant amount of legal expenses fighting for the voiding of an agreement that was already voided. Why? Was there a need to deplete all of Meigs money to prevent Meigs from having the money to continue to fight? What did that achieve? Ending the fight stopped activity against the lawyers; thus, depleting Meigs of money further served to only protect the conspired lawyers and created more conspiracy in doing so.

Trusted Lawyer Goes to the Dark-Side?

9. Castille hired on with Bruce Jamison and both continued extensive and expensive litigation whilst even their pleadings indicated the missing family code remedy. Later Meigs found out that Jamison was friends with Bergman. Was Jamison continuing the protection of Frankfort and mostly Bergman for conspiring to protect Frankfort's aiding and abetting by writing litigation that increased the expenses and bills for service until Meigs had no money left to fight?

Implication of Meigs' Lawyer's Friendship with Bergman

10. Jamison brought Adam Morris into the Meigs case as a divorce lawyer. Unknown to Meigs, since the agreement had not been acted upon within one year, the agreement was void; yet, Adam Morris included the invalid agreement battle into the divorce decree. Why would Morris continue the deception that the agreement required litigation when the one year contract law is first year law school and all are seasoned lawyers? Who does Morris hold loyalty to first, the referral or the client?

Control Continues Through Referred Lawyer Association

11. Why did Jamison require Morris to include him in all emails to me? Was Jamison maintaining control over the narrative so that Meigs would not find out that the agreement was void and continued to create litigation against a voided agreement? Was Castille given the opportunity to work for Jamison another method to control the narrative and prevent Meigs from fighting against the injustices, deceptions, fraud, and all by giving unemployed Castille a job?

Control Extends from Corporate Lawyers to Divorce Lawyers?

12. What law enforcement agency protects the public against the fraudulent behavior of lawyers? Bergman is the current sitting chair of the Texas State Bar on ADR so there is absolutely no reason to believe that the Texas State Bar would judge Bergman or possibly any of the others without prejudice as they are friends. How does the public find justice?

Texas State Bar Protects Their Own? - Sunset Review Must Fail to Protect the Public

13. How was Meigs prejudiced against with the judges in claims against Bergman and Zucker? Find out in the next blogs.

Meigs Prejudiced Against - Sexism? Quid Pro Quo?



(1 original handwritten, 1 altered handwritten, 1 significantly different printed version)


Meigs was told that the lawyers representing Bergman and Zucker as well as Bergman and Zucker are powerful enough to make sure that Meigs would find no one to represent her, that they were influential enough with various individuals in the courts and justice to block her cases from continuing to trial and prevent any law agency from pursing what appears to be clear claims. Meigs experienced additional tactics to force signature to a printed version of the mediation agreement that released liability of all lawyers. Meigs refused.

No one should be above the law. No one should be allowed to obstruct justice through influencing anyone. The public needs to be aware that justice system/courts may consider some individuals too high to fall while they dismiss valid claims by the public and force the public to be accountable whilst they walk away. Our ancestors suffered for fair courts and our military fights for our freedom every day. We must reclaim the courts for the people.

Help Meigs Force Accountability! Stop Mediation Abuse! Protect the Public!

58 views0 comments


Anchor 1
bottom of page